Harrilibrary

NO. 1 SOLUTION GROUND FOR ALL PROJECT MATERIALS, ASSIGNMENTS, TERM PAPERS, PUBLIC ENLIGHTENMENT, SCHOOL NEWS, CONFERENCE PAPERS, THESIS/DISSERTATION, AND OTHER EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH.

Recent

For complete project materials and assignments call us with +2348127963962

Watch Word

Treat every human being with the fear of God believing that we are all from the same source and in that same source we will all return to give account of our earthly dealings with one another

Wednesday, June 12, 2019

HOW MANAGER’S DECISION CAN CREATE OR DISTROYED AN ORGANIZATION


ABSTRACT
This paper seeks to identify how the manager’s decision can create or destroy an organization, it also analyzes the detailed steps which a manager can take to run a smooth organization and failure to put the below mentioned steps into consideration can lead to the failure of the organization.

INTRODUCTION
 It is widely believed that managers have a huge impact on the success of organizations. The ability of the person at the top aspects an organization through a number of channels and should trickle down through the hierarchy and thus have a strong effect on organizational performance (Rosen, 1982). But how big are these effects? What difference does the quality of the single person at the top makes for the overall performance of the organization? There is recent empirical literature which aims at measuring the contribution of individual managers to the performance of their organization (see e.g., Bertrand and Schoar, 2003; Lazear et al., 2014; Graham et al., 2012) exploiting the variation which arises from the fact that, in the course of the careers, some managers are active in several organizations or functions which allow disentangling their contribution from other factors. However, this is a difficult endeavor as CEOs, for instance, typically stay at the top of a specific firm for longer time periods and work as CEOs only for a very small number of different  firms (very often only one) in their lifetime { which limits the scope to measure their contribution to organizational success.
The paper thus contributes to the growing literature empirically analyzing the impact of managers on different economic measures, such as corporate behavior (Bertrand and Schoar, 2003), corporate tax avoidance (Dyreng et al., 2010), managerial compensation (Graham et al., 2012), or disclosure choices (Bamber et al., 2010). In a prominent, the study, Bertrand and Schoar (2003) try to assess the impact of managers on firm performance, analyzing to what extent manager decision can explain the observed heterogeneity in corporate behavior. They use a manager-firm matched panel data set that comprises different CEOs in different firms and focus only on those firms that have employed at least one mover manager, i.e. a manager who can be observed in at least two firms. The results show that manager decisions are important determinants in explaining corporate behavior.
More recently, Lazear et al. (2014) study data from a large call center where supervisors move between teams (and team composition varies over time) which allowed managers to take full control of the organization and how this can lead to the growth or the down fall of any firm...

HOW MANAGER’S DECISION CAN CREATE OR DESTROYED AN ORGANIZATION
For any organization to succeed or fail the manager has some responsibilities which he or she has to do for the growth and sustainability of the organization and if he or she failed to do so, the organization is bound to fail and below are some of the decisions which a manager must take to end sure the growth of the organization;
Planning
It is the task of managers not only to decide what to do, but also to plan this in the agenda. Planning has to do with foresight. This includes short-term planning (weekly, monthly and quarterly), medium-term planning (annual) and long-term planning (looking ahead with a timeline of 3 years). Planning determines the direction of the organization. On the other hand, a predetermined time span means that when time runs out, whatever result one has at the time must suffice. The development of this timeline must be closely monitored. And failure for the manager to plan the organization is a band to fail.
Nevertheless, improper implementations of planned activities have been attributed to why there are Failures instead of the planning process itself in most circles. Often organizations are stripped of funds, basic infrastructures and instructional facilities lacked and even salaries for education staffers are not promptly paid in most developing countries. Strike actions are a common phenomenon in these countries. Obviously, the position of teachers and other staffers are not considered.
Lack of material and financial resources have jeopardized the education sector that the government and philanthropic supports are no more seen. In trying to ameliorate the decaying infrastructure and facilities required for effective teaching and learning. These issues still bothering education in the third world societies today would have long been overcome in this 21st century but persistent bribery and corruption made practically everything impossible to accomplish. It becomes imperative that any nation who wants to develop along the global trends must consider education a national priority not to toil with it. This serves a good purpose for developing countries to properly plan along the line without making a mockery of the institution. Planning thus ensures cohesion of activity and enables maximal accomplishment of set out objectives and goals with limited resources. It calls for just –in- time management of all processes as to cooperatively achieve a result. Without planning, human, material and financial resources available cannot be fairly utilized to achieve organizational goals.

Organizing

Managers not only have the task of assigning activities but also have the task of allocating these tasks to their respective departments and employees. To achieve an end result, the manager needs the necessary resources, including budget, raw materials, personnel, and expertise, technology and machines. He/she will have to organize all sorts of things to achieve the end result. To get started as efficiently as possible, it is important that the employees’ division of labour suits the end goal and end result as well as possible. But if the manager fails to organize the workers the organization is bound to fail.

Staffing

This section relates to the personnel policy and all related activities within an organization. Good and competent personnel are crucial for an organization to function optimally. It is the task of the manager to first identify the expertise, skills, and experiences required for certain positions. Based on this, job profiles are drawn up and personnel can be recruited. The entire recruitment, selection, and training procedure falls under this staffing policy and ensures that the right type of employee is in the right place. The decision of the manager on the quality of staff that are employed to work in the organization can be improved or destroyed the organization if not properly scrutinized.

Directing

Direction, of course, lies in the hands of the manager; he/she is the person with final responsibility and is held accountable for this. In practice, this means that the manager maintains control over all functions. In addition, the manager monitors but also motivates his employees. He/ she tells them how best to do their work encourages them and drives them to take on certain challenges. For any organization to fail or succeed it is in the hand of the manager because if the manager fails to direct both the human and material resources at his or her disposal to drive the organization forward, such an organization can fail due to the manager’s inability to direct the day to day activities of the organization.

Coordinating

With this concept, it is the task of the manager to connect different sections and to achieve cooperation. A good manager has a so-called helicopter view, which gives him/her an overview of what is happening and what still needs to be done. From this perspective, he/ she is able to coordinate tasks and manage his employees. It is his/her task to synchronize different departments and to bring them together with the right end goal in mind.  If the manager lacks the coordinating ability to bring together all the organs of the company under his or her control, the organization can fail.

Reporting

Without reporting, there is no evidence. A clear report keeps communication open throughout the entire organization. Managers are the linking pin between the management team and their own employees, who form the constituency. Reporting provides insight into the progress and agreements can also be recorded in this way. Other essential information—such as problems with employees, new processes, performances interviews, and sales figures—is also made transparent through reporting. Involved parties can also quickly find archived reports. If the manager failed to report the report of the organization to the management team for proper action and decision to be taken, the company can fail due to lack of adequate and proper report.

Budgeting

Finance is the lifeblood of any organization. The manager is responsible for the management, expenditure, and control of the department’s budget and also has to keep an eye on tax details. In addition to employee wages, it is the task of the manager to also properly monitor other expenditures such as materials and investments. If wasteful spending, overruns, errors or even fraud are discovered, the manager is responsible for taking action. If there is no proper budgeting for plan activities of the company, the organization can fail at any time.
Supervision
The purpose of supervision is to bring about continuous improvement in the instructional program. Cox and Langfitt write, "Management executes, directs; supervision advises, stimulates, explains, leads, guides, and assists. Both plan, both diagnose, both inspect, but management decides and orders execution, while supervision helps to decide and assist in improving instruction. Self-Development for Organization Managers, you will have learned that the first action of an organization manager is to identify the mission of the organization and to set the objectives.
The head will then need to identify different strategies by which to achieve the agreed mission and objectives. Through the planning process, the head aims to manage an efficient and effective organization. Efficient means using minimum resources to get maximum results on time. Effective means to achieve the set of objectives. The third part of the planning stage is thus to decide on an appropriate strategy.

CONCLUSION
As the hallmark for organization success, the Organization manager must carry out an in-depth analysis of all organization activities that involving staff, and neighborhood community in planned actions in keeping good organization – community relationship (Igwe,1999). Good organization – community relationships brew a sense of belongingness among the organization and community members. It further enhances communication that is beneficial to build a team to give all staff fair participation in planning and implementing some organization activities. In view of this importance, planning cannot be implemented with inadequate information. The information must be communicated to staff, and community of that organization in good time. Planning ensures time management process and commitment. No wonder successful organization heads enjoy the support of their staff, students, and community because of openness in organization planning. Proper leadership planning ensures having clear, shared goals is an important factor in increasing group productivity and reducing group conflict (De Souza & Klein 1995).
, finally determines the potency of the leader to attain set out specific goals in good time through the recognition of strengths and weaknesses of the human, material and financial resources available to the organization.


No comments:

Post a Comment